Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Sign Up
Young's Stuff
Blog Home All Blogs

Cyber Security, Direct-Line Changes in the Industry, Optical-Recognition Vehicle Registration

Posted By Thom Young, February 2, 2016

The Evolution of Cyber Security

Logging into a work station hasn’t really changed much in the last 20 years. Some IT managers have tried to improve the locks at the gate but, no matter their efforts, people still seem to find a way to defeat the safeguards put in place. If you’re like me, you likely keep a file somewhere with all the passwords for the various places you need to access on your computer. While the practice isn’t recommended, it’s sort of necessary, isn’t it? My file is four pages long. I have a good memory, but not that good. Most of my passwords also contain minor deviances from each other. The similarity helps me remember them without needing to go look in this file. That practice too is not recommended, but I’ve been using that system to manage my passwords since I studied cryptology as a young soldier nearly 45 years ago. Back then, we learned that any password could be cracked with enough time. The effectiveness of a password then as now is determined by the time necessary to crack it. No matter how complicated a password you use for any application, the improvement in computing power and speed are constantly reducing the time needed to break the code. Recently, I’ve been using a password-management program to remember a number of my logins. This program claims to use an algorithm to store my password, and this filter changes routinely to provide a very secure storage site. I’ll stick with the story I’m telling though: all passwords can be cracked with enough time and effort, no matter how you calculate them.

The amount of effort invested in trying to access a password has to be valuable relative to what you get out of it. I’m quite sure that no one is going to invest much time trying to access my account with the American Philatelic Society, but maybe they’d be willing to put supercomputer power to work on my banking or business logins. I’m flattering myself with my own importance here, but I think you’ll understand my point.

I’ve been following a number of articles on cyber security recently and noted one in Canadian Broker magazine citing the most common passwords in use today. Despite all the warnings, few of us seem to take heed or even care. Here’s the latest list of the top 20 most-used passwords:

Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Password
123456
password
12345678
qwerty
12345
123456789
football
1234
1234567
baseball
welcome
1234567890
abc123
111111
1qaz2wsx
dragon
master
monkey
letmein
login
princess
qwertyuiop
solo
passw0rd
starwars
Change from 2014
Unchanged
Unchanged
Up 1
Up 1
Down 2
Unchanged
Up 3
Down 1
Up 2
Down 2
New
New
Up 1
Up 1
New
Down 7
Up 2
Down 6
Down 6
New
New
New
New
New
New

A programmer friend of mine advises me that he has a simple little application on a thumb drive that will try all of these (and some not listed) on any login in less than 10 seconds. Apparently, you can download this app off the internet. If you’re using these passwords for any application login, I think you should immediately consider changing them to something more secure.

A strong password needs to be at least eight characters long and should contain both upper and lowercase letters, at least one number, and at least one non-numeric or alphabetical character. It should be a random group and not contain a complete name in letters. The longer the password following the same principles, the more secure it is. As I stated at the outset of this discussion, all passwords are breakable, but the stronger it is, the longer it takes to break it and, therefore, the better protected the data past the password becomes. Microsoft has some good advice on this subject.

Recently, much talk has circulated on the future use of biometrics as the new standard for a secure login. Essentially, some indicator unique to you, such as your fingerprints, retinal scans, heartbeat, palm print, voice analysis, or facial features, can’t be easily duplicated by a computer hacker or thief. This biometric identifier can be read by your computer, often without the need to install a special piece of hardware. Almost all laptops and notepads now come with a built-in camera. All that is needed is the correct facial-recognition software to provide only you with access without having to input anything on the keyboard. Likewise, audio filters and touch pads determine fingerprints and such.

Facial-recognition software is advancing at such a tremendous pace that retail establishments commonly use it to track customers in their stores. A computer program tags their images with data on when they come, what they purchase, and what their preferences are. The information is available for analysis and target marketing later.  I’ve seen this kind of software demonstrated in conjunction with an office data-management system similar to that used by many brokers in their offices now. When clients walk in the door, the program notifies reception with their names and CSR. Depending on the program’s configuration, the CSR can be automatically advised that the clients are in the waiting area, and either a computerized reception station informs the clients that the CSR will be out to meet them momentarily or the receptionist is prompted to say the same thing. All this information is integrated on the CRS’s workstation or tablet with the production records in the clients’ records and files. This is quite an efficient process compared to that just a few years ago. A number of American banks are also using this technology to increase safety and security for their customers and the business.

I wonder what new developments we’ll see in the future. I also wonder what inroads will be made into personal privacy when customers’ movements are tracked by facial-recognition software and the retailers share the information among themselves. Will we walk into the grocery store to find a basket already containing all our usual items and a few special ones being promoted by the store? I don’t know how I’d feel about that marketing. I also don’t know if a negative view would make any difference because the change seems to be inevitable.


Direct-Line Changes in the Industry

Last week, we were all a little surprised to learn that the Royal Bank of Canada decided that its general-insurance returns weren’t adequate to its needs and reached an agreement with Aviva Insurance for RBC’s P&C purchase. This acquisition initially sounded to me like a good deal for our industry—another major bank admitted it had been unable to compete on a level playing field and was vacating the business. In fact, the reality seems to be that Aviva has purchased RBC General Insurance Company’s general-insurance book of business and appointed the company to represent its products in the same manner as any other broker. While I’m now not so sure anymore that this transaction is a win for our business, I am sure that it’s not a loss.

We compete in a competitive marketplace. As brokers, we have better choices for our customers than most of our competitors. Direct writers, whether they be offshoots of company players on the broker side of the game or agents for a stand-alone business, cannot effectively compete with the brokerage channel on price or product. This difference has always been the case and continues to be the reality of the insurance marketplace in North America. Aviva partnering with RBC Insurance isn’t going to change that reality. Neither will Intact expanding its direct channels in the marketplace nor, as I read today, Economical introducing a direct channel, affect that difference. These efforts by any insurers are doomed to lack-luster returns and short-lived efforts just so long as we as brokers get out there and compete for our market share. We excel at giving the best service to our customers and finding the best insurance solutions for them in price and product, so we don’t need to fear anyone in our market. Time will tell if this new venture between Aviva and RBC will be a success.  However, as brokers, we should all continue with excellent customer service so that we continue to beat RBC in competition.

Manitoba Gets Rid of License-Plate Stickers

When talking about technological advances, the simple process of eliminating license-plate stickers for registration renewal, as Manitoba has done, doesn’t at first seem like much of a big deal. So what if, in Alberta, it would eliminate the annual ritual of obtaining a new expiration sticker and putting it on your license? However, the reason these stickers have become redundant is just a small sample of how the technical advancements of optical recognition have progressed. The dash camera that is becoming standard on all police cars is connected to the provincial database through the computer in the police car and can read any license plate from quite extraordinary distances and instantly determine the registration status. The sticker, on the other hand, relies on the human eye’s limited vision and can determine only its validity. Wired cars are the new norm. Soon the digital repository of information relative to the owner and operators of the car will become part of the digital record available to law enforcement. Tracking stolen vehicles and citing drivers for infractions will become an automated process. Photo-radar tickets will contain the identity of the drivers, an automatic adjustment to their driving records, and a link to the insurer’s databases. Immediate adjustments in premium can be determined and the real function of UBI will come into play. Customers will be charged for the true underwriting risk immediately. Talk about an incentive to change behaviour! The duties of traffic police will be not much different than those of the parking authority—digitally recording infractions and violators. The world is going to continue to change.

In Closing

I’m hoping the take up of people following my column continues to increase. The new format allows IBAA members to make comments directly on the blog and share thoughts not only with me but also with other readers. If you prefer, you can email me instead with any comments you’d like to make. Just remember to subscribe to the blog (under Your Network in www.ibaa.ca) so you receive notice of its publication. Looking forward to hearing from you!

The opinions expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of IBAA.
Comment on this post below or email Thom Young privately. Thom also encourages suggestions for topics.

 

Tags:  Aviva  banks  biometrics  broker channel  cyber security  direct writer channel  IT  license plate  optical recognition  passwords  RBC  telematics  UBI  vehicle registration  Young's Stuff subscription 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Flood Coverage Confusion, Demise of the Broker, Driverless Cars, AIC Online License Application

Posted By Thom Young, October 7, 2015
Well, the frost is certainly on the pumpkin in Southern Alberta. As a rather large flock of Canada geese heading directly south flew right over my place, the last one looked back at me as if to ask “What are you waiting for?”  Our fall departure for the southern climes has been delayed since our usual date coincides with the birthday of our middle grandchild. We’re not allowed to be away until after that. Besides, I’ve still got much to get done here this fall, so my Canadian perspective on things remains pure at the moment.

Flood Coverage Confusion

In addition to the usual number of interesting things to talk about at the couple of industry gatherings I’ve attended in the past few weeks, “flood” coverage and its limitations seems to have generated quite a bit of confusion. Many people are concerned about the new limitations on sewer backup endorsements that insurance companies are slipping into customer renewals. The implications for E&O exposure on the broker side are staggering. Clients may think they have coverage but don’t if the proximate cause is “overland water.” If a nearby creek over flowed its banks 72 hours before or after the sewer backup, then the proximate cause is “overland water.” In the past, many of us wondered why sewer backup would respond when the proximate cause was flood, an uninsured peril. Questions of this nature used to be answered with a blank stare, but now an actual wording limits the cover. Do clients still have good coverage? Try explaining the coverage and all the limits and exclusions when, as a broker, you’re not sure about the benefits yourself. The real kick on this will come with the next major flood event, which could be next year or not for five. The interpretation and, more importantly, limitations and exclusions of these coverages will not be firmly established until we meet up with a catastrophic loss. I worry about my customers and the way these changes impact my responsibilities to them.

Advice on the “overland water” coverage provided by various companies is even more difficult. The only wording I’ve been able to secure is the one from Aviva. I’m told that The Co-operators has one on the market and that Wawanesa and Intact are soon to enter into the competitive fray, but I’ve no idea how one product compares with another. Explaining the differences must be very confusing for a personal-lines CSR. A jaded person might suggest that the new coverage isn’t sufficient enough to move forward with a competitive response in any great urgency. We are back to the original conundrum with flood coverage. The coverage needs to provide adequate distribution of risk and sufficient premium to deal with claims. These are interesting times for insurance brokers and even more confusing for the buying public. Oh well, who needs brokers? I’m sure an internet link will eventually provide all the correct answers.

The Demise of the Broker

Once again the industry press is predicting that insurance sales intermediaries (the fancy legal term for sales people) are on the road to redundancy. According to those who claim that you can find online information to purchase just about anything without any assistance, sales people are irrelevant, an unnecessary distraction, and perhaps an annoyance. Online information sites are becoming better, they claim, and giving intelligent choices with proper information prompts to allow the consumer to purchase increasingly complicated things without the need for a company representative. These statements are all true but, and it’s a big BUT, one of the most important parts of arranging a contract that promises to do something in the future is the meeting of minds when the deal is struck. When only one mind is in play, the value of the contract is uncertain because of potential misinterpretations. The legality of the contract may be suspect as well.

Look, I’m not one of those anti-tech people. I’m all for using any available distribution method to get our products and services out to the public, but at the end of the process a real person must negotiate the interests of all parties to the transaction to ensure that their real needs are met and the legal process of the contract is respected. I support the notion that the value added of a properly trained insurance adviser will continue to be an important part of the distribution process for all insurance products. Any suppliers (insurance companies) that fail to understand the support they get from such an individual risks their business success. All of the technical simplifiers, online applications and quotes, information algorithms, coverage prompts, and flashy digital pictures used by the insurance companies serve only to drive to the finished transaction between two people, the insured and the broker/agent. The manner of this meeting could be changed by technology, but the importance of it and the value to all parties won’t be.

Speaking of Human Redundancy, What about Driverless Cars?

As the technology continues to advance in this field, we are very close to the tipping point where these vehicles become a reality in the norm. No longer just a strange thing, they will be reliable and cheap enough to become a common sight in many jurisdictions. Getting to this stage won’t be easy. Many hurdles will need to be jumped before the legislation becomes uniform enough to operate these vehicles in different jurisdictions. Further, the reliability of these vehicles in operation will need much demonstration, documentation, and proof. Who is going to insure these vehicles? Who is the insured? Current legislation in Alberta would likely see the vehicle insured in the facility market. The insured would be the owner of the vehicle as per the statute wording of the SPF 1, which defines who is insured. The owner would include the driver whether that be a computer with AI capability or your brother-in-law who borrowed the vehicle while visiting town. The driver will need to be more properly defined, but such definition is not an insurmountable obstacle as the usual operator (normally the owner) would be produced for the application record. In my view, the functional manner in which that person operates the vehicle or delegates its operation would be irrelevant (I repeat, in my view—legal disclaimers abound—this is my opinion). Definition of the driver may have some grey areas that may challenge the regulators, but let’s hope they’re looking at it now and have some kind of contingency in place to deal with it when it happens. Our Alberta regulatory response to changes in our business has tended to follow the leaders instead of making good changes for our market by being the leaders (again, IMHO)!

If anyone thinks we’re talking about something way off future, think again. On last report, 48 vehicles are being operated in a California Google study. These vehicles operate in a highly dense urban environment and function extremely well all on their own, with no human intervention in the completion of their assignments. Yes, some minor accidents have involved these vehicles, but none of them can be defined as at fault—so long as you don’t use the other drivers’ distraction at a driverless vehicle as an excuse. The tests incurred some minor injuries in accidents but, again, they were due to the manual operation of the vehicle by technicians. No reports have been made of any traffic violations in the operation of these vehicles. While only four states have made provisions for autonomous vehicle operation, their use will doubtless soon be expanded to new jurisdictions in short order.

The concept of a self-driving automobile lets the mind wander into some interesting possibilities. For example, in a Top Broker editorial, Jeff Pearce discusses flying cars.

Certainly, driverless cars have a huge number of benefits. All of the advantages of having a chauffeur come to mind.

That $26 a day you pay in parking won’t be much of an issue. Just send your vehicle away to wait for you to tell it to come pick you up. Where you send it might be an issue, but I’m sure you could program around that hitch.

Auto theft would become an issue of the past. Imagine trying to steal a car that’s driving you to the police station, emitting an alarm, and has already sent the police a picture it has taken of the crook trying to steal it. Following that logic, your vehicle can become part of your home security system, keeping an eye on things around the house and reporting suspicious activity to you.

What about the kids needing to get to the rink or to dance? No more juggling schedules or negotiating with other parents to get them there and back—just send the car (or the other parent’s car).

Studies claim that the average person who lives and works in a high density urban environment spends as much as four months of their adult life looking for a parking place. Imagine how many more clients you could see if your car just dropped you off and came back to get you when you were done. Your productivity would increase substantially.

The technology has huge implications for the insurance industry, most of them very positive. Loss ratios on automobile insurance are composed substantially by administration and adjudication costs. Imagine the elimination of arguments regarding fault by the ability to review 360° digital recordings of the accident scene prior to the accident, during the accident, and after the accident? Much less discussion will be needed to determine who did what and who should have done what. The mind boggles. In some insurance markets, recording technology is already making a difference with the mandatory use of GoPro technology in commercial automobiles. We’re moving that way here too as the price of this technology declines. The price won’t be an issue when it comes built into your next automobile.

The mind can wander into the future. We can embrace new technology and work with it, or not. Based on my own musings here, the positives far outweigh the drawbacks. We certainly won’t be talking about distracted driving anymore, and underage drivers will be in a different class than they are now. The future is ours!

New Technical Frontiers

Speaking on the issue of technology advancement ….

As one of your representatives on the General Insurance Council, I’ve been working to resolve an amendment to the cumbersome regulations surrounding the DR’s role in recommending an individual for a license. As it now stands, only the DR is able to sign the application to sponsor an individual for a license. The DR is not able to delegate this authority to any other individual in the office. While this duty likely isn’t much of a burden for those operating a smaller shop with only one office and a few employees, the larger the brokerage, the more cumbersome this requirement becomes. New hires in branch offices are often stuck in an unproductive limbo waiting for the paperwork to get completed to give them the proper authority to act as an agent. If the DR is away on holidays or sick leave, further unnecessary delays can occur. In the logical flow of things, particularly in a multiple-office brokerage, the branch or office managers are responsible for the all functions of their location. They recruit, hire, and train new staff and are entrusted with all the duties of a self-directed senior manager except the submission to the regulator to transfer or change the license of one their employees. The DR in head office needs to sign the paperwork physically. I’ve maintained for years that this requirement is inefficient, impractical, and unnecessary. I know many other DRs share my perspective.

Recently, the AIC sent out an email advising of new online provisions for Levels 1, 2, and Probationary New License Applications. If you have not done so already, I strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the contents. Transfers and Level 3 General applications are still being handled in the old manner, but I’m told these procedures will also be updated. DRs can now delegate supervision of these online application preparations. DRs still need to endorse the submission to the AIC, but, now that it’s online, DRs can review and digitally endorse the transaction from wherever they are. This provision should provide greater efficiency and speed up the process.

I wonder what the take up is and will be on this processing ability and if it will in fact reduce the amount of paperwork. I will be asking questions about the new process at the upcoming GIC meeting and encourage your feedback on this topic. While I’m supportive of these changes, I still feel the process can be adjusted to provide for the complete delegation of the DR’s authority within larger organizations. I can’t seem to get the point across that the delegation of authority doesn’t negate the responsibility. Please let me know what you think.

In Closing

It’s hard to remain focused and unbiased given the political climate at the moment. It’s hard to be complacent with so many issues before us and so many different points of view! Still, as I voice my opinions in this column, I want simply to remind everyone to exercise the right to express your opinion at the ballot box. I cannot stress enough that this ability is your ultimate right to self-determination. Your vote can help change the things that are bad in the world and make a difference for everything that needs to be supported. This right has been fought for through many generations. The equality demonstrated by the line ups at the voting booths is one not shared by many other people in our world. Tyrants and brutal cultural influences that mute the voices of the people don’t belong in a modern society. Many young people in our new technological society don’t see the need to use this franchise or don’t believe their actions make any difference. They see the “trending” perspective instantly on issues and can’t understand how slow the process of a functioning democracy is to change. That slow process becomes even slower when people don’t vote. Politicians won’t think about to your concerns if they know that listening to your problems won’t get them a vote. Make a difference and get involved. Get out and vote. If you don’t care enough to get out and vote, you can’t later complain about what the government is doing!

The opinions expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of IBAA.
Comment on this post below or email Thom Young privately. Thom also encourages suggestions for topics.

Tags:  Alberta Insurance Council  Aviva  Aviva overland flood policy  broker channel  competition  customer service  DR authority  driverless cars  Google  GoPro  Intact  online insurance  overland flood insurance  sewer backup insurance  The Co-operators  Wawanesa 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Political Changes, Online Crime Increases, Overland Flooding Competition, AIC Update

Posted By Thom Young, June 2, 2015

To Quote Shrek, “Change is good, donkey”


When it comes to change, I’ve always sat with the optimists. Change of any sort can be disruptive and difficult for some, but it always brings with it new perspectives and new opportunities. Analyzing the effect of change in your marketplace gives you a competitive advantage, particularly if your competitors are slow to react or quick to react in the wrong manner. Being the first one with a positive message will always win you more credibility than harping about the difficulties the change will bring. Change is inevitable in all things; dealing with it is your only option. How you deal with it will determine how it affects you.

The political front is certainly a different landscape before us in Alberta. Doubtless, people had more than enough of the ruling regime and demanded change. You can debate whether or not the change they have effected is the kind of change they wanted, but that won’t change the outcome. The popular vote certainly did not go to the new ruling party but, with the right of centre divided and the left of centre united, the first past-the-post outcome in this three-horse race was assured almost from the get go. In a democracy, the will of the people cannot be denied, and we will have to deal with whatever changes are produced on that account.

The insurance industry will experience a number of years of trepidation. The NDP perspective on auto insurance is a threat to our businesses, and a hard market (should it arise even for a short period of time) would bring the political forces to bear upon this issue. Unfortunately, auto insurance wasn’t part of the discussion in this past election, and one would believe this topic presents no immediate threat. Our industry in Alberta has never faced this kind of threat before, so it would be wise to begin to prepare and strategize for possibility of the discussion. Interesting times?

One might observe though that the previous government wasn’t as kind to us as we all thought it should be. Premium roll backs on auto insurance were somewhat disruptive, not to mention financially difficult for us. Brokers in particular had to suffer commission charge backs, often arriving in a different fiscal period. The return of money spent because of a misguided belief that the public had been mistreated by rates was more than a minor inconvenience to many brokerages. That, followed by the introduction of auto insurance reforms that continue to interfere in the natural competitive market for auto insurance in Alberta, doesn’t support the notion that a right-of-centre government is better for our circumstances than the new incoming one.

Those of us who have registry offices have direct experience with the ineptitude of the previous government. A succession of nearly a dozen different ministers has proven a lack in the simple understanding of the challenges of running a business where your revenues are limited by regulations while your expenses increase unchecked. Registry agents have been doing their best to convince the government that fees charged the public should be adjusted through a fee model taking into account the factors that affect revenues and expenses. While the model is logical from a business perspective, for over 10 years the service fee received by registry agents has remained the same even while the government has increased its fees substantially over the same period. Considering just the increases in rents and salaries in Alberta over this 10-year period, it impossible to understand why requests for fee increases to account for these fell on deaf ears, particularly from a government that is supposed to be cognizant and supportive of business issues. I don’t believe you’d find too many registry agents who felt that the previous government was their “friend.” Who knows what’s in store for these businesses under the new government? The success of the registry agent service-delivery system in Alberta is the idol of governments everywhere. Will the government follow the principle that, if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it? We will have to wait and see.

I for one am looking for the new opportunities that will present themselves to us in short order.

Online Crime Continues to Increase


phishingRecently, an item circulated purporting to be from the Canadian Revenue Agency asking for credit card information in order to deposit your tax refund directly to your credit card account. This followed recent notices from CRA that the office would like to do away with cheque refunds and have you initiate a direct deposit for your refunds. CRA has a great site for this—safe, secure, and easy to use. Unfortunately, the email purporting to be from CRA wasn’t from CRA. The link took you to a site that sure looked like CRA’s but, of course, was a new twist on an old internet scam called phishing. An email purporting to be from a bank or insurance company asks you to click on a link and confirm your data. Once you do so, the data you input is stolen in a form of identity theft. Every day people are caught in this scam and the thought is always the same: “It looked real.” Well, that’s the point.

Protecting Canadians from online crime, new laws are now in effect and bring new rules about data management and cooperation with investigations. Still, other than on TV, law enforcement officials who are the least bit interested in investigating this kind of crime or have any of the skills necessary to actually do so are hard to find. Focusing on the most heinous of crimes involving distribution of images and abuse of children, these new laws are the first step to bringing actual legal discipline to our new communication technology, but we are a long way from consequences.

My advice on this remains the same. Unless you initiate the contact and are on a secure website indicated by the lock symbol, put none of your information on the internet. If in doubt, call the company and verify they are who they are. The electric company won’t even talk to you about your account without verifying who you are by asking you questions. You should not have more trust in the process than they have. Verify and confirm—sensitive information should be shared only when you are certain you are sharing it with the right people.

People caught up in the so-called CRA phishing scam gave out their SIN number, name, address, birth date, and credit card data—all the information necessary to begin the process of identity theft. The consequences of this might not be discovered for years. Don’t get caught by this.

The First Competitive Response to Overland Flooding Coverage


As has been predicted, the markets’ response to the Aviva overland flood coverage has seen a new entry in Alberta with the Co-operators’ announcements last week.

The broker side has some new competition through this product from the direct writers. We are still awaiting updates from other markets on this, but this announcement is certain to put additional competitive pressure on them. If anyone has heard any current rumours, I would be interested in hearing about them.

AIC Stakeholder Sessions Have Been Completed


AIC stakeholder sessions were held in the past two weeks in both Edmonton and Calgary. I attended only the Calgary meeting but had updates on the issues raised in Edmonton. It was nice to see that the very vocal life-insurance minority who had been clamoring for relaxed entrance standards determined to let these meetings pass without making a spectacle of themselves once again. It was also nice to see the interest from the General Insurance community expressed on the examination and education issues. Updates were provided on the efforts underway to improve the pass/fail rates on the examinations without reducing the standards of education needed to both enter our business and advance within it. The process of establishing equivalencies for professional designation holders and matching education providers' courses to other jurisdictions was discussed as well. Two General Insurance sub-committees are working hard on these issues and hope to provide actionable decisions on both issues by the end of July. If you have opinions on these matters and would like to ensure that they are brought to the attention of the people working on these issues, please don’t hesitate to forward them to me. As a sitting member of the General Insurance Council, I will be happy to ensure that your thoughts on these issues are heard.

The AIC also reported on the licensing cycle, which is well under way. If you haven’t received an email from the AIC on this matter, you’re not recorded properly in the system. All license holders are personally responsible to ensure that their licenses are in good standing before they represent themselves to the public. This means your Continuing Education Credits need to be up to date, your declarations made, and your licensing fee paid by the end of June or you are not eligible to receive compensation for selling insurance. Make this process a priority, people.

I’d like also to mention that you are now required to know your CIPR number. This number identifies you across most Canadian jurisdictions and enables things like your CE credits to be followed wherever you are licensed. Your CE certificate now requires your CIPR identification, so all education providers are asking for it. Make you know what it is and have it with you when you are signing the attendance sheets.

In Closing


Summer is almost here. Time to go for a bike ride!

The opinions expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of IBAA.
Comment on this post below or email Thom Young privately. Thom also encourages suggestions for topics.

Tags:  Alberta Insurance Council  Aviva  broker channel  CIPR numbers  CRA  direct writer channel  insurance license renewal process  licensing courses and exams  NDP and insurance  online crime  overland flood insurance  phishing  The Co-operators 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 
more IBAA Courses and Events

2017-06-13 » 2017-08-31
Convention Educational Sessions (Recorded)

2017-07-24 » 2017-07-28
Licensing Level 1 Immersion - Calgary

Featured Members

Online Surveys
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal